Abstract
This paper deals with the load frequency
control of Distributed Generation Systems (DGS) consisting of Wind, Solar and
Diesel Generator. The Diesel Generator is controlled either by P or PI or PID
controller to inject regulated amount of real power to the power system based
on its rating. As a result it regulates the mismatch between the real power
generation and the load which will lead to a minimum power and frequency
deviations. A systematic way of deciding frequency bias parameter along with
tuning the gains of the Proportional, Integral and Derivative controller (PID)
based on Ziegler-Nichols method and ITSE performance criterion is proposed. The
simulation studies are carried out for different types of controllers, and
disturbances and it is found that it regulates the frequency with less number
of oscillations, minimum peak over shoot, and settling time in the case of PID
controller.
Index Terms—Distributed
Generation Systems (DGS), Proportional, Integral and Derivative Control (PID),
ZieglerNichols method, Optimization methods, Tuning, Frequency Control, Diesel
Generators, Wind and Solar, Simulation Analysis.
BLOCK DIAGRAM
Fig.
1. The Block diagram of the Distribution Generation System with Diesel
Generator, Wind, Solar power supply and Power System.
SIMULATION
RESULTS
Fig.
2. Simulation results of case 1 when wind (0.6 pu), solar (0.3 pu) constant and
change in load (0.9 to 0.95 pu) at 100sec : (a) Power Demand and Power Supply
in pu (b) Power generated by diesel generator in pu (c) Frequency deviation in
Hz.
Fig.
3. Simulation results of case 2 when Load (0.9 pu), solar (0.3 pu) constant and
change in wind power (0.6 to 0.4 pu) at 100sec : (a) Power Demand and Power
Supply in pu (b) Power generated by diesel generator in pu (c) Frequency
deviation in Hz.
Fig. 4. Simulation results of case 3 when Load (0.9 pu), wind (0.6 pu) constant and change in solar power (0.3 to 0.2 pu) at 250sec : (a) Power Demand and Power Supply in pu (b) Power generated by diesel generator in pu (c) Frequency deviation in Hz.
CONCLUSION
In
this paper a systematic approach for tuning of PID controllers in DGS and
calculation of optimal frequency bias are presented. The robustness of the
proposed controller is checked with different case studies. The simulation
studies of DGS with PID controller shows a better performance in terms of time
domain specifications: rise time, peak over shoot, peak time, settling time,
and steady state error, than P and PI controllers. When the load or power
generation changes occur in the DGS, the PID controller acts such that the
Diesel Generator will compensate for the required power. This resulted in the
minimum oscillations in the frequency and power. Finally the PID controllers
stabilize the system quickly with zero steady state error in less settling
time. The frequency bias calculation is very important in the power system
dynamics and played a key role in controller gains. This factor directly
effects the individual components like Diesel Generators and finally overall
performance of the DGS. So the selection of frequency bias is very crucial and
is addressed in this paper.
REFERENCES
[1]
D.Lee and Li Wang, ”Small Signal Stability analysis of an Autonomous Hybrid
Renewable Energy Power Generation/Energy Storage system time domain
simulations”, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol.23,no.1, March.2008.
[2]
A. Keyhani and Jin-Woo Jung, “Distributed energy systems,” Journal of Iranian
Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. 1, no. 2, pp.
33-40,Summer and Fall 2004
[3]
3] D. J. Hall and R. G. Colclaser, “Transient modeling and simulation of a
tubular solid oxide fuel cell,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 14, no. 3,
pp. 749–753, Sep. 1999.
[4]
M. D. Lukas, K. Y. Lee, and H. Ghezel-Ayagh, “Development of a stack simulation
model for control study on direct reforming molten carbonate fuel cell power
plant,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1651–1657, Dec. 1999.
[5]
P. S. Dokopoulos, A. C. Saramourtsis, and A. G. Bakirtzis, “Prediction and
evaluation of the performance of wind-diesel energy systems,” IEEETrans. Energy
Convers., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 385–393, Jun. 1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.